Clarke’s Corner – An Update

Written by Clarke Kent

I have been very happy with the progress we are getting through the assistance of Lois Lane. We are both in close contact and communicate almost daily. We have learned many new things concerning Shellie and her murder. We have interviewed a number of cooperating peers of Shellie and am happy with our progress. I will share with readers a few things we learned.

BB is using his facebook page as a dating website, according to several females. I quote from one female. “BB is her friend via facebook and he is really annoying always hitting on her and actually I have heard that from a few different people. Apparently, he uses facebook as a dating website and females find him weird and very annoying. I did go thru his page and it is true he seems to be hitting on every female he comes in contact with.”

Lois Lane as identified BB’ s wife who has remarried and has 2 children.

Learn thru a source that LJP “has been put in witness relocation program. He said he verified this somehow.”

Justice with Lois Lane has identified several sources who knew Shellie and actually played softball and basketball with her on the team. Lois relates the following. “She will have a team photo of Shellie playing basketball with PH as the coach. BA was also on the team as well as 2 or 3 other girls that she knows she actually plays softball with her. The main buzz was that Shellie told people that she was being sexually and physically abused…and that she was extremely scared of him. She says a lot of people have always assumed it was him. She did say that she does know Shellie lied a lot and was sleeping with multiple men. Also LP and EW and CT (female) were her good friends. they were all very promiscuous and in fact kinda LP and CT (male) were friends with benefits and she believes LP will lie at any cost to protect CT. She has a lot of interesting info?

One last thing – Lois Lane reveals in this email the following:


Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Shellie Sighted on Va beach Blvd Four Hours Prior to Murder

Written by Clarke Kent

This post deals with an alert to Justice from a bus driver for the HRT who wrote the following email. “I saw shelly rideing her bike on va blvd that night she looked very young to me I wondered why she was out so late I was driving a city bus at the time I did notice a white or cream color car following her pretty close with two men one driving was white and husky and a passenger small white the car was med sized I didn’t get a lience plate I wish I had . im sorry I never thought I could help but after all this time it still bothers me ! god bless you !”

This comment appeared in the Justice for Shellie website on Jan 4, 2016, written by Anon Linda. I was quick to contact Anon Linda and have had two separate meetings that were also attended by several other people associated with Justice.

The basic reason these interviews and info were held in abeyance was because of inconsistencies in the time line. Anon Linda claims that she was the bus driver on Va Beach Blvd and because the route requires that she arrive at each pick up location at specific times. On this evening she started around 11 PM and was traveling East on Va Beach Blvd. She arrived at one of her appointments pick up shots early and while parked on the East Bound Va Beach Blvd she observed a single young female riding a bike on the opposite side (VB Blvd) going westbound. As she watched this young lady ride her bike she also observed a white sedan medium sized following at a distance. She because transfixed on watching the bike rider and the white sedan. She explained her intense interest was because she was molested as a young girl and some how she sensed possible danger. the time line she observed the young lady was between 12:20 and 12:25 AM. She continues as the bike rider passed in the westbound lane she saw the whole vehicle had two riders. the driver was taller than the person on the passenger side she could not see the driver but could only see a smaller image of the passenger. She describes the car as white or cream in color and it was following who she believes was Shellie, at a close distance. When prodded she feels that the bike rider (Shellie) was unaware of the car. Anon L continues that the car was in the far right lane and for obvious reasons was driving at the same pace as the bike, thereby traveling 15 mph in a 45 mph sped limit on Va Beach Blvd. As the bike passed she watched as she approached the Little Neck Rd corner and did observe that the bike turned right followed by the medium sized sedan.

While Anon L stands by her timeline of 12:20 to 12:25, Justice feels we should re-examine our information.

If she was inaccurate about the time and it was 11:20 – 11:25 it would fir into Justice’s timeline We know Shellie was talking to BB on his home phone for the period of 10:54 to 11:44 PM. That would be corroberated by the telephone records. Remember I was always concerned about BB demanding he speak to her on his home number and that Saturday he wouldn’t answer his cell, but only accept calls on the home line. I was suspicious of this pattern, especially on the period of time of her muder.

The car matches BB vehicle however BB could not be in the car since he was home talking to Shellie unless there was a way to transfer the call to his cell phone.

Justice is requesting our cadre to contribute to the information Anon L supplied as she claims a picture helped identify Shellie as the bike rider. The white vehicle was similar. Could the bus driver have been incorrect in her timeline? Could Shellie after leaving the 7-11 traveled via Va beach Blvd instead of a more direct route of Kings Grant Rd? If this was indeed Shellie who was following her on Va Beach Blvd?

If the time line o the bus driver is accurate this was not Shellie. Even the bus driver stated that she looked so young, was alone and she felt in a dangerous position and identified her from news clippings. Was the car following the bike rider a parent following their daughter for safety? Your opinion?


Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

R – Questions Re Mysterious Letter Spurs Interest in Writer’s Motivation

Written by Clarke Kent

R in a comment of a post entitled “Why Does Boyfriend (BB) Repeatedly Stumble – Creating Excessive Drama?” post date May 12, 2017, asks the question of BB the boyfriend and his girl friend did it and requested Clarke response. I have reviewed my files and will discuss what was stated in this 2 page letter to Mr and Mrs Carson. I attach it as exhibit “A” for readers evaluation.

The mysterious letters consisted of 3 separate handwritten letters. Bill Cason in a e-mail on Feb 3, 2006 to Det Dennis Herbert. (See Exhibit “B”) states “at least three handwritten letters by one unknown writer were sent to us concerning Shellie’s murder. The first was mailed directly to the police. The second was sent to us through our church secretary and minister. The third was left at the memorial at Kings Grant Traffic Circle. After studying the second letter more thoroughly we are concerned that the letter writer may be mentally unstable and make be Shellie’s murderer.

Previously Justice thinking was that the motivation of the writer was to divert attention from the real killer to BB, the boyfriend. R’s question peaked my curiousness and I focused on what was the persons motive for trying to alert the police and the Carsons was. I never focused on the possibility that this writer may have legitimate information. Now the question before our sleuth cadre is just that. Let’s make an effort to consider that some of the information in the mysterious letter may be correct and proceed from there, in essence he the writer focuses on BB motivation and a new girlfriend and tried to comfort Shellie that he was “break up and call off the wedding.” Mysterious writer continue with he “tried to talk to our daughter (Shellie), but your daughter cried and boyfriend had her knocked out.” Justice has learned that BB met his new wife at Shellie’s funeral and she was Shellie’s friend. If that was true BB would not want anyone to know that he had met her prior for that reason the funeral which obviously was immediately after her murder was an ideal cover to haste marriage to her.

Now that can explain BB motivation, however what is the motivation for mysterious writer? Why does he do work so diligently to expose BB is the murderer, with his girlfriend possible present. Mysterious man also introduces that “boyfriend and new girlfriend will try collect reward to move away, but your daughter’s spirit is haunting him repeatedly.” The reward money as a motivation, if true they would have to involve themselves or maybe he thinks girlfriend will identify BB.

Mysterious writer also tells us he is anonymous and the police dept is corrupt and LE is trying to kill him. He closes with a suggest “the boyfriend will crack if police push him via new girlfriend’s associate.” Consider this was written 2 1/3 months after the murder and anonymous Mystery writer pinpoints new girl friends associate. Interesting letter. Consider his motivation. It must be very important.




Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Why Does Boyfriend (BB) Repeatedly Stumble – Creating Excessive Drama?

Written By Clarke Kent

I have been pondering for many years in the investigation of Shellie’s murder, the relationship between BB and Shellie and I am leaning in the direction that Shellie wanted to break off the relationship and that in fact so called reconciliation was a sham. That in fact the only person revealing the make up was the boyfriend BB. Everything we know about BB reunion back with Shellie in the early morning of Sunday Aug 14, 2005 came from BB, however he has repeatedly misrepresented what transpired. Why all the drama? Justice believes that the make up was “make believe” and his revealing were created to bolster his case that it was an amicable reunion. Almost everything BB discusses about his early morning visit can be refuted.

Justice has covered in our website/blog BB own statements he wrote on the blog himself and everything can be refuted by his contradictions, his slips and mistakes. Justice has brought this out numerous times. If we take simply the reconciliation issue we can show that all discrepancies can be refuted. Look at some of the issues we discussed and decide for yourself. Starting with the ring issue, then to the cell call issues and then there is the reconciliation itself, as well as Shellie’s texting during their make up. Ass to these issues the rationale for not calling Shellie when he arrived home as promised as he claims Shellie did was false, add to that BB called MF instead obviously of confirming this reconciliation.

We also know that Gigi the next morning received a call from BB prior to the start of his job at JC Penney at 10 AM in which he told Gigi that Shellie was murdered via being run over by a vehicle. And he requesting Gigi to call the Carson’s before speaking to police. She also described her opinion of BB fake crying. I know from talking with both Bill and Charlotte that police arrived at their home about 10:30 Am on the morning of the discovery of Shellie’s murdered body and she was identified by Charlotte who matched the sneakers worn by Shellie with the ones the victim was wearing shortly thereafter.

Put all this with the fact that the police arrived at JC Penney after 11 AM and told BB of Shellie’s murder. BB and his parents were driving him home from work when he called MF while he was working at the BK. So we know that BB called MF when he arrived home after being with Shellie and he called him again after police alerted him of her murder. However we know that he promised to get her cigarettes the next morning (Sunday) but never did, however he called Gigi telling her of Shellie’s murder prior to learning that from police.

Put it all together and it leads to someone so inconsistent with what happened, you must ask yourself a basic question. Why does BB repeatedly stumble, slip, blunder on the truth. What is he hiding by all the drama he produces when addressing simple basic questions about his reconciliation with Shellie? And the last time together.

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

The MF Interview- Clarke’s Thoughts and a New Red Flag

Written by Clarke Kent

Lois Lane and myself met with MF at a restaurant on Va Beach Blvd. The interview was set up by a call from Z to MF while we were interviewing Z. MF arrived exactly at 12 noon and joined me at a table, and Lois Lane arrived minutes later. I found MF to be cooperative with a calm manner. We actually interviewed him for 2 hours and 15 minutes and it appeared he was not in a rush to conclude our discussion early. He told us about where he worked now and gladly gave us his cell number. Lois Lane in her post on April 29, 2017, outlined the major points learned.

These are the points I thought important and will share them with you. MF worked the night shift at the 7-Eleven from 11 PM to 7 AM. He also started work at Burger King at 8 am. Remember his mother was in management with this Burger King. He received a call from BK just after 7 AM about 45 minutes prior to his start time there inquiring if he knew where Shellie was. He remembered that he was outside the 7-Eleven cleaning up the area when he observed sirens and fire vehicles speeding toward Kings Grant. This and the call from BK were indications that something was not right and he had concerns that Shellie’s safety was an issue. When BB called him after police visited him at work, he called MF as BB headed home with his parents. They talked and MF revealed that he had a bad feeling when she left and when he heard police sirens and activity heading toward the Kings Grant Rd. He definitely knew something has drastically happened when the BK called him inquiring about Shellie.

MF talked about the fight between Shellie and BB the early evening when they, BB, MF, and Shellie went to Circuit City. My gut feeling was that the fight was manufactured by Shellie to provoke a dispute as she played one boy against the other. The substance of the fight issue was juvenile giving MF an opportunity to be with her. Shellie had a reputation for manipulating young guys and had issues with other females who resented her presence because she came on to their boyfriends.

There were many call calls between Shellie, MF and BB. Of importance, both guys spoke to each other twice prior to Shellie’s murder. One was at the 7-Eleven about 1030 PM and again when BB called him at the 7-Eleven when he arrived home, after his so called reconcilliation with Shellie. This call was unknown to me and set off a Red Flag Alert. Let me explain. When BB left BB tells us that Shellie said to him “call me when you get home” So I’ll know your okay. The alert is BB never called Shellie as the reconciliation promise was requested to call her. BB could never explain that, however, he told us he just forgot. Why would BB call MF to tell him he arrived home and not his beloved Shellie who was his fiance. This just doesn’t make sense and tells us that just maybe be reconciliation never occurred. Think this through as it potentially opens a Pandora’s Box with extensive unseen troubles for BB. Add his rings rationale and his haste marriage. The Red Flag is it doesn’t stand the test of a harmonious conclusion.

Posted in Uncategorized | 34 Comments

Shellie’s Balancing Act – MF and BB Her Pawns

Written by Clarke Kent

After 7 plus years of talking and learning from her friends I have come to a conclusion that Shellie “free spirit” sexuality of using others as her pawns produced her prowess over teenage boys and one middle age man. Shellie learned and used her sexual appeal to attack and manipulate them for her own purposes. Shellie played guys like pawns. Especially BB and MF and was to cavalier in attitude and created too many conflicts with guys and girls. While that is my opinion of Shellie’s actions, I think it is important to know this Shellie. Was it responsible for her murder? That is an entirely different question. It could of or could not of been a factor, however it’s important to know that Shellie acted the way she did for singularly her own purposes.

BB and MF were caught up as boyfriends and ex boyfriends with both understanding who Shellie was. She manipulated them sometimes were a little rough for their feelings. Shellie however was an expert in hiding things from her parents and brother, as well as her current boyfriend BB. But BB know little about Shellie’s other life.

Now we must take a look at others unveiled with Shellie’s manipulations. Dunn (FB), PH (the guy who discovered the body) and numerous others who are known to us. What we don’t know is who else out there had similar experiences with Shellie. MF was the ex boyfriend who was with Shellie prior to her brutal murder. Justice believes he was always dedicated to Shellie and Shellie always went back to him for comfort and MF mother was Shellie’s second mother in Va Beach. BB was newly in love with Shellie and had very little experience with girls and either didn’t see what was happening or just didn’t want to believe Shellie look at other males.

These are my opinions and thoughts on Shellie, BB and MF. We must seek the truth of Shellie’s murder however we must always look in the context of Shellie’s life style. This 18 year old girl deserves that the murderer should be brought to justice.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Justice Interviews MF – Shellie’s EX/ 7-Eleven Clerk – Her Last Words

Written by Clarke Kent

Both myself and my new assistant Lois Lane met MF at 12 Noon on April 15, 2017 for an interview that lasted 2 hours and 15 minutes. I asked Lois Lane to write her own version of the interview. I have learned that my astute assistant has a shrewd mind which I appreciate and of great value.

As you read her post you will learn from him several things about Shellie’s funeral, what happened to her rings, MG take on their non-discussion of the party believed to be where Shellie arrived from at MF’s 7-Eleven.

I think it is important to put this interview reported by Lois Lane in perspective. There are no words changed or edited but just the exact words appeared by Lois Lane. Lois did a very commendable job and is definitely a major asset to the Justice for Shellie website/blog.

I will follow up her comments with my own version and my own opinion. Please see the following attachment of Lois Lane’s interview with MF.



Posted in Uncategorized | 15 Comments

Justice on the “Z” Interview – Shellie’s Protector

Written by Clarke Kent

Lois Lane is a big asset to the Justice for Shellie website/blog in not only helping us on new leads, but for astutely participating with me on interviews. She brings a female perspective to issues and handle questions with intelligence and acute manner. Please see her personal observations attached as Exhibit “A.”

We set the interview for the same Burger King that Shellie worked for just prior to her death. The background of loud music was very annoying for me and I was happy Lois Lane was there to catch anything I may have missed. Zhas a name of ZS and physically is a large impressive man, with a soft spoken dialogue. We found out that Z was originally from New York, but was raised in Va Beach and became MF god brother and he was helped greatly by MF family. We also discovered that Shellie who considered MF mother as a second mother, was part of some of the family life, and as “Z” states we meaning Shellie, MF and his sister M hung out together. We also found out that CT, prior to CT incarceration was boyfriend and girlfriend to Shellie. It appears that when CT was released from his 1 year term, he wanted to continue his relationship with Shellie and that caused problems. Shellie was very afraid of CT and he had MF stay at her home because she feared CT to visit her at her house. MF at a point was discovered in the bathroom shower and Mr. Carson threw him out. It appears the Carsons never knew the reason why he was there since Shellie never let them know. With MF banned “Z” stepped up and protected Shellie until he was jailed for unexplained reasons. “Z” tells us that while he was in jail he heard from the TV of Shellie’s murder and immediately knew it was CT. He also told us that a pink and black bicycle was probable at her home, hidden from her parents since he also worked at BK and frequently they all rode bicycles to work. He also sad he saw text messages on Shellie’s phone from CT that were threatening. At one point I asked “Z” if he was afraid of CT? I felt embarrassed asking him, he gave a negative reply. “Z” is a well built man with a powerful body and my question was answered before I asked him.

I was impressed by “Z” soft spoken manner and his cooperative attitude. He appeared to care fondly for Shellie and my feeling that he enjoyed being Shellie’s defender. He is very street savvy and talked with confident street wisdom. He was gracious and at one point when we discussed MF, he took out his cell phone and contacted MF and coordinated a meeting with MF the next day at 12 noon.He is very believable. I urge all to review Lois Lane’s comment as Exhibit “A” and please let us both know your take on “Z” as Shellie’s protector.


Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Probable Cause – Affidavit – Search Warrants – Missing Affidavit??

Written by Clarke Kent

The missing affidavit after almost 12 years of an unsolved murder is not only puzzling but consistent with the investigation into Shellie Carson’s murder on Aug 14, 2005. Every document Justice has requested has been met by opposition, usually under the grounds that it is an ongoing investigation or it was discarded either accidentally or because of the years passing by. While Justice was able to obtain the actual search warrant it’s valued lied in the supporting document known as the affidavit which outlined the existence of the facts and circumstances of facts and which would give a magistrate “reasonable trustworthy information, sufficient in themselves to warrant a person of reasonable caution to believe that a crime has been committed.” Another words that a judge must have legitimate probable cause support within the affiant to issue a search warrant.

In order to help understand that a judge doesn’t grant a warrant without some legit evidence concerning the crime. I quote from the Barron’s Legal Guide written by Steve Gifts.


The search warrant was obtained from the clerks office at the Va Beach Circuit Court. I had a copy of the search warrant made and when I questioned the clerk, about the supporting affidavit, she was unable to produce the affidavit. She instructed me to seek help from a supervisor who I called and told me she would try to obtain the accompanying affidavit. Now I understand the process and if something is sealed from a court order it is put in a sealed envelope that also accompanies the document you requested. However the search warrant was by itself with no sealed envelope attached. After waiting almost 2 days I called the contact who was very polite and inquired, however she still couldn’t answer what happened to the affidavit.

The question I ask myself is why is this case so clouded in secrecy? Why would a search warrant for a person (Wolfman) who was an initial suspect, however he was dropped as a suspect pretty early in the investigation. What was in the affidavit that still has to be protected even after the suspect was dropped as a suspect? Why is any legitimate effort to obtain information on this case so difficult to obtain? The only information we can obtain is thru talking with the Va Beach community – Why? Was the search warrant legal? In another way was the issuance of the warrant tainted and probable cause was not met? Thoughts?

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Justice Obtains Early Search Warrant in Shellie’s Murder

Written by Clarke Kent

The first search warrant in Shellie’s investigation was obtained by Det B.K. Seabold on Aug 15, 2005 and it authorizes a search of a 2 story single family home at 34– Kings Lake Drive. The warrant was executed 5 hours and 15 minutes after a judge approved of the search on 8/15/2005 at 9:30 AM. Beside the search of the house, warrant indicates it also includes sheds, vehicles, and curtilage. The following property, objects and/or persons searched for are “a pair of black women’s pants, women’s underwear, any stained clothing, any trace evidence to include hair, fibers and blood, and a computer.” The search warrant further committed to seize said property, persons and/or objects if they be found and to produce before the Virginia Beach Circuit Court an inventory of all property, persons, and/or objects seized.”

“the search warrant is issued in relation to an offense substantially described as follows: Virginia State Code 18.2-32; Murder” (See attachment B) the Virginia Code Title 18.2-13 is in relation to an offense substantially described as “First and Second Degree Murder.” It states the following:

“Murder, other than capital murder, by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, or by any willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing, or in the commission of, or attempt to commit, arson, rape, forcible sodomy, inanimate or animate object sexual penetration, robbery, burglary or abduction, except as provided in § 18.2-31, is murder of the first degree, punishable as a Class 2 felony.

All murder other than capital murder and murder in the first degree is murder of the second degree and is punishable by confinement in a state correctional facility for not less than five nor more than forty years.”

Det B.K. Seabold was the applicant and stated in the search warrant that , “I, the undersigned, have found probable cause to believe that the property or person constitutes evidence of the crime identified herein or tends to show that the person(s) named or described herein has committed or is committing a crime, and further that the search should be made, based on the statements in the attached affidavit sworn by B.K. Seabold 1084.”

Det Ray Pickell executed the warrant and obtained the following items and his search inventory included (See Attachment C):

  1. Blue T-Shirt
  2. Underwear
  3. white plastic bag w/ food wrappers
  4. Pillow Case
  5. One Pair or T-Shoes
  6. Dell Computer tower

Thus search warrant targeted JS known as Wolfman and his residency. The statements in the warrant indicates that an attached affidavit sworn by Det B.K. Seabold supports the probable cause evidence of the crime.

My next post concerns this search warrant will discuss probable cause and affidavit.




Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments